18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Bridgestone Potenza S001 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Hankook ION Evo

Test Profile

Bridgestone
Potenza S001
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Hankook
ION Evo
Number of tests
5
5
1
Best position
#3
#1
#1
Average position
7.0
2.2
1.0
Latest test
2020
2025
2025
Available sizes
185
63
64

Wet

Wet
Bridgestone Potenza S001
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Bridgestone Potenza S001
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Wet braking
Bridgestone Potenza S001
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Wet circle cornering
Bridgestone Potenza S001
67%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Wet handling
Bridgestone Potenza S001
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - cross
Bridgestone Potenza S001
83%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Hankook ION Evo
87%

Dry

Dry
Bridgestone Potenza S001
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry braking
Bridgestone Potenza S001
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Dry handling
Bridgestone Potenza S001
94%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Comfort

Comfort
Bridgestone Potenza S001
60%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Exterior noise
Bridgestone Potenza S001
60%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Hankook ION Evo
66%

Costs

Costs
Bridgestone Potenza S001
67%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Rolling resistance
Bridgestone Potenza S001
57%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Hankook ION Evo
69%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison