18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Bridgestone Potenza S001 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Bridgestone
Potenza S001
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
5
5
3
Best position
#3
#1
#2
Average position
7.0
2.2
3.7
Latest test
2020
2025
2025
Available sizes
185
63
34

Wet

Wet
Bridgestone Potenza S001
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Wet braking
Bridgestone Potenza S001
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Wet circle cornering
Bridgestone Potenza S001
67%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Wet handling
Bridgestone Potenza S001
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Bridgestone Potenza S001
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Aquaplaning - cross
Bridgestone Potenza S001
83%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Falken e.Ziex
61%

Dry

Dry
Bridgestone Potenza S001
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
Bridgestone Potenza S001
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
Bridgestone Potenza S001
94%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Falken e.Ziex
81%

Comfort

Comfort
Bridgestone Potenza S001
60%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Bridgestone Potenza S001
60%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Costs

Costs
Bridgestone Potenza S001
67%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
Bridgestone Potenza S001
57%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Falken e.Ziex
95%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison