18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparator | Contact Us

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak W810 vs. Nexen N Fera Primus

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

Bridgestone

Blizzak W810

VS

Nexen N Fera Primus

Nexen

N Fera Primus

Also compare with

PremiumContact 7

Cinturato P7 C2

Turanza T005

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Nexen). Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (87%) than Nexen (34%). The first tyre test of Bridgestone Blizzak W810 was done in 2019, compared to 2022 when was the Nexen N Fera Primus first tested.

Test Profile

Bridgestone

Blizzak W810

Nexen

N Fera Primus

Number of tests

1

6

Best position

#7

#10

Average position

7.0

12.7

Latest test

2019

2024

Available sizes

56

60

Wet

Wet

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

51%

Nexen N Fera Primus

73%

Wet handling

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

34%

Nexen N Fera Primus

64%

Aquaplaning - cross

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

78%

Nexen N Fera Primus

77%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

67%

Nexen N Fera Primus

79%

Wet braking

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

40%

Nexen N Fera Primus

76%

Wet circle cornering

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

61%

Nexen N Fera Primus

70%

Snow

Snow

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

78%

Dry

Dry

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

67%

Nexen N Fera Primus

62%

Dry braking

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

78%

Nexen N Fera Primus

72%

Comfort

Comfort

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

58%

Nexen N Fera Primus

65%

Exterior noise

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

44%

Nexen N Fera Primus

66%

Costs

Costs

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

73%

Nexen N Fera Primus

59%

Mileage

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

67%

Nexen N Fera Primus

49%

Ice

Ice

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

74%

Performance spider chart

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison