18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparator | Contact Us

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak W810 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

Bridgestone

Blizzak W810

VS

Kumho Ecsta HS52

Kumho

Ecsta HS52

Also compare with

PremiumContact 7

Cinturato P7 C2

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (87%) than Kumho (63%). The first tyre test of Bridgestone Blizzak W810 was done in 2019, compared to 2022 when was the Kumho Ecsta HS52 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 75% of Bridgestone Blizzak W810 has C wet grip rating, whereas 75% of Kumho Ecsta HS52 has A rating.

Test Profile

Bridgestone

Blizzak W810

Kumho

Ecsta HS52

Number of tests

1

10

Best position

#7

#2

Average position

7.0

6.0

Latest test

2019

2026

Available sizes

56

104

Wet

Wet

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

51%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Wet circle cornering

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

61%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

Wet handling

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

34%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Aquaplaning - cross

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

78%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

66%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

67%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Wet braking

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

40%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Dry

Dry

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

67%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

87%

Dry braking

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

78%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

Snow

Snow

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

78%

Comfort

Comfort

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

58%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Exterior noise

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

44%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Costs

Costs

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

73%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

Mileage

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

67%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Ice

Ice

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

74%

Performance spider chart

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison