18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak W810 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71

Test Profile

Bridgestone
Blizzak W810
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Number of tests
1
3
15
Best position
#7
#2
#2
Average position
7.0
3.3
9.0
Latest test
2019
2026
2025
Available sizes
56
60
225

Wet

Wet
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
51%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Wet circle cornering
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
61%
Hankook Ventus Evo
96%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Wet handling
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
34%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Aquaplaning - cross
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
67%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%
Wet braking
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
40%
Hankook Ventus Evo
95%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%

Snow

Snow
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
78%

Dry

Dry
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
67%
Hankook Ventus Evo
83%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Dry driving behavior
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
38%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Dry braking
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
76%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
76%

Comfort

Comfort
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
58%
Hankook Ventus Evo
75%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Exterior noise
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
44%
Hankook Ventus Evo
73%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%

Ice

Ice
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
74%

Costs

Costs
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
73%
Hankook Ventus Evo
80%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Mileage
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
67%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
65%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison