18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak W810 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Bridgestone
Blizzak W810
Hankook
ION Evo
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
1
1
3
Best position
#7
#1
#2
Average position
7.0
1.0
3.7
Latest test
2019
2025
2025
Available sizes
56
64
34

Wet

Wet
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
51%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Wet handling
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
34%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - cross
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
78%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
67%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet braking
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
40%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Falken e.Ziex
87%

Dry

Dry
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
67%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
78%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Falken e.Ziex
88%

Snow

Snow
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
78%

Comfort

Comfort
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
58%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
44%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Costs

Costs
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
73%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%

Ice

Ice
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
74%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison