18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak W810 vs. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from Japan. Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (87%) than Falken (58%). The first tyre test of Bridgestone Blizzak W810 was done in 2019, compared to 2018 when was the Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 75% of Bridgestone Blizzak W810 has C wet grip rating, whereas 70% of Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun has B rating.

Test Profile

Bridgestone
Blizzak W810
Falken
ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
Number of tests
1
23
Best position
#7
#2
Average position
7.0
6.6
Latest test
2019
2025
Available sizes
56
194

Wet

Wet
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
51%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
73%
Wet braking
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
40%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
76%
Wet circle cornering
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
61%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
76%
Wet handling
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
34%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
68%
Aquaplaning - cross
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
78%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
85%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
67%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
85%

Dry

Dry
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
67%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
77%
Dry braking
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
78%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
77%
Dry driving behavior
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
38%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
89%

Snow

Snow
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
78%

Comfort

Comfort
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
58%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
73%
Exterior noise
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
44%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
73%
Interior noise
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
67%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
67%

Ice

Ice
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
74%

Costs

Costs
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
73%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
64%
Mileage
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
67%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
70%

Performance spider chart

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison