18 Shops · 56,847+ Products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak W810 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo

Bridgestone Blizzak W810Premium
BridgestoneBridgestone

Blizzak W810

R14 – R17
Falken e.ZiexUpper-middle
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Hankook ION EvoPremium
HankookHankook

ION Evo

9.0
R17 – R22
Also compare with
SportContact 7 PremiumContact 7 UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Bridgestone
Blizzak W810
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
ION Evo
Number of tests
1
3
1
Best position
#7
#2
#1
Average position
7.0
3.7
1.0
Latest test
2019
2025
2025
Available sizes
56
34
64

Wet

Wet
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
51%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
67%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Wet braking
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
40%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Wet handling
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
34%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - cross
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
78%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook ION Evo
87%

Snow

Snow
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
78%

Dry

Dry
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
67%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry braking
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
78%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook ION Evo
91%

Comfort

Comfort
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
58%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Exterior noise
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
44%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
66%

Costs

Costs
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
73%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook ION Evo
71%

Ice

Ice
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
74%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison