Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak W810 vs. Continental VanContact Winter vs. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 vs. Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van

Premium

Bridgestone

Blizzak W810

R14 – R17

VS

Premium

Continental

Also compare with

Turanza T005

Test Profile

Blizzak W810

VanContact Winter

EuroWinter VAN01

MPS530 Sibir Snow Van

Number of tests

1

2

1

Best position

#7

#1

#6

#9

Average position

7.0

1.0

6.0

9.0

Latest test

2019

Available sizes

56

46

32

18

Wet

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

51%

Continental VanContact Winter

94%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

66%

Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van

67%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

67%

Continental VanContact Winter

81%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

67%

Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van

67%

Wet braking

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

40%

Continental VanContact Winter

94%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

71%

Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van

62%

Wet circle cornering

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

61%

Continental VanContact Winter

92%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

72%

Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van

72%

Wet handling

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

34%

Continental VanContact Winter

95%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

57%

Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van

66%

Aquaplaning - cross

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

78%

Continental VanContact Winter

74%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

67%

Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van

78%

Snow

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

78%

Continental VanContact Winter

85%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

48%

Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van

78%

Snow traction

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

83%

Continental VanContact Winter

92%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

50%

Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van

72%

Snow braking

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

78%

Continental VanContact Winter

84%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

56%

Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van

78%

Snow handling

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

76%

Continental VanContact Winter

82%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

40%

Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van

80%

Dry

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

67%

Continental VanContact Winter

62%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

82%

Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van

63%

Dry braking

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

78%

Continental VanContact Winter

72%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

89%

Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van

71%

Comfort

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

58%

Continental VanContact Winter

75%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

80%

Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van

56%

Exterior noise

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

44%

Continental VanContact Winter

65%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

91%

Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van

42%

Interior noise

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

67%

Continental VanContact Winter

77%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

71%

Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van

67%

Costs

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

73%

Continental VanContact Winter

43%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

89%

Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van

68%

Ice

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

74%

Continental VanContact Winter

74%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

86%

Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van

74%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

Organization	Season	Year	Dimension
ADAC	Winter	2019	205/65 R16	View

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak W810 vs. Continental VanContact Winter vs. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 vs. Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van

Blizzak W810

VanContact Winter

EuroWinter VAN01

MPS530 Sibir Snow Van

Test Profile

Wet

Snow

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Ice

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Add to comparison