18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak W810 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52

Test Profile

Bridgestone
Blizzak W810
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Number of tests
1
14
10
Best position
#7
#8
#2
Average position
7.0
13.4
6.0
Latest test
2019
2026
2026
Available sizes
56
153
104

Wet

Wet
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
51%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Wet braking
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
40%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Wet circle cornering
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
61%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Wet handling
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
34%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Aquaplaning - cross
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
67%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Wet performance
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
49%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
55%

Dry

Dry
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
67%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Dry braking
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Dry performance
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
46%
BFGoodrich Advantage
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%

Snow

Snow
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
78%

Comfort

Comfort
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
58%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Exterior noise
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
44%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%

Ice

Ice
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
74%

Costs

Costs
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
73%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Mileage
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
67%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison