Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak W810 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Falken e.Ziex

Premium

Bridgestone

Blizzak W810

R14 – R17

VS

Upper-middle

BFGoodrich

Advantage

e.Ziex

9.0

R15 – R21

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Blizzak W810

Advantage

e.Ziex

Number of tests

1

14

3

Best position

#7

#8

#2

Average position

7.0

13.4

3.7

Latest test

2019

2026

2025

Available sizes

56

153

34

Wet

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

51%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Wet circle cornering

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

61%

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Wet handling

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

34%

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Aquaplaning - cross

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

78%

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

67%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Wet braking

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

40%

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Dry

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

67%

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dry braking

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

78%

BFGoodrich Advantage

76%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Snow

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

78%

Comfort

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

58%

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Exterior noise

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

44%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Costs

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

73%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Mileage

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

67%

BFGoodrich Advantage

63%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Ice

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

74%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak W810 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Falken e.Ziex

Blizzak W810

Advantage

e.Ziex

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Snow

Comfort

Costs

Ice

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison