Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Vredestein Wintrac Pro vs. Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330 vs. Laufenn I FIT Plus vs. Viking WinTech

Premium

Bridgestone

Blizzak LM-005

VS

1 mutual test(s) with detailed data

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

WinterContact TS 870

UltraGrip Performance 3

Test Profile

Blizzak LM-005

Wintrac Pro

Winter i*cept evo3 W330

I FIT Plus

WinTech

Number of tests

49

37

18

6

Best position

#1

#10

#11

Average position

3.2

6.4

5.1

14.5

20.8

Latest test

2024

2025

2023

2024

Available sizes

213

128

93

—

59

Performance comparison

Wet Performance

90%

Bridgestone

Blizzak LM-005

65%

Vredestein

Wintrac Pro

79%

Hankook

Winter i*cept evo3 W330

62%

Laufenn

I FIT Plus

54%

Viking

WinTech

Wet Braking

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

100%

Vredestein Wintrac Pro

51%

Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330

67%

Laufenn I FIT Plus

67%

Viking WinTech

59%

Wet Handling

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

92%

Vredestein Wintrac Pro

69%

Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330

77%

Laufenn I FIT Plus

61%

Viking WinTech

53%

Wet Circle Cornering

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

88%

Vredestein Wintrac Pro

63%

Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330

63%

Laufenn I FIT Plus

63%

Viking WinTech

63%

Aquaplaning Longitudinal

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

84%

Vredestein Wintrac Pro

75%

Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330

92%

Laufenn I FIT Plus

67%

Viking WinTech

51%

Aquaplaning Cross

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

88%

Vredestein Wintrac Pro

65%

Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330

96%

Laufenn I FIT Plus

50%

Viking WinTech

42%

Dry Performance

79%

Bridgestone

Blizzak LM-005

72%

Vredestein

Wintrac Pro

83%

Hankook

Winter i*cept evo3 W330

65%

Laufenn

I FIT Plus

68%

Viking

WinTech

Dry Braking

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

73%

Vredestein Wintrac Pro

73%

Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330

81%

Laufenn I FIT Plus

73%

Viking WinTech

57%

Dry Handling

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

85%

Vredestein Wintrac Pro

71%

Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330

85%

Laufenn I FIT Plus

56%

Viking WinTech

78%

Snow Performance

66%

Bridgestone

Blizzak LM-005

74%

Vredestein

Wintrac Pro

78%

Hankook

Winter i*cept evo3 W330

80%

Laufenn

I FIT Plus

69%

Viking

WinTech

Snow Braking

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

66%

Vredestein Wintrac Pro

66%

Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330

76%

Laufenn I FIT Plus

66%

Viking WinTech

66%

Snow Traction

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

76%

Vredestein Wintrac Pro

76%

Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330

76%

Laufenn I FIT Plus

86%

Viking WinTech

76%

Snow Circle Cornering

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

57%

Vredestein Wintrac Pro

81%

Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330

81%

Laufenn I FIT Plus

88%

Viking WinTech

65%

Comfort & Noise

64%

Bridgestone

Blizzak LM-005

64%

Vredestein

Wintrac Pro

64%

Hankook

Winter i*cept evo3 W330

82%

Laufenn

I FIT Plus

73%

Viking

WinTech

Noise Exterior

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

64%

Vredestein Wintrac Pro

64%

Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330

64%

Laufenn I FIT Plus

82%

Viking WinTech

73%

Economy

53%

Bridgestone

Blizzak LM-005

46%

Vredestein

Wintrac Pro

53%

Hankook

Winter i*cept evo3 W330

53%

Laufenn

I FIT Plus

61%

Viking

WinTech

Mileage

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

53%

Vredestein Wintrac Pro

46%

Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330

53%

Laufenn I FIT Plus

53%

Viking WinTech

61%

Tests used in comparison

Organization	Season	Year	Dimension
Autobild	Winter	2023	225/45 R18	View

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

View general comparison

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Vredestein Wintrac Pro vs. Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330 vs. Laufenn I FIT Plus vs. Viking WinTech

Blizzak LM-005

Wintrac Pro

Winter i*cept evo3 W330

I FIT Plus

WinTech

Test Profile

Performance comparison

Tests used in comparison

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison