18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Nokian WR Snowproof P vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

Test Profile

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Nokian
WR Snowproof P
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3
Number of tests
49
7
24
Best position
#1
#4
#1
Average position
3.2
9.7
2.7
Latest test
2024
2025
2025
Available sizes
213
55
302

Snow

Snow
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
Nokian WR Snowproof P
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
75%
Snow braking
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
Nokian WR Snowproof P
83%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Snow traction
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
Nokian WR Snowproof P
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
Snow handling
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
72%
Nokian WR Snowproof P
68%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
62%
Snow cornering
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
77%
Nokian WR Snowproof P
64%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
Snow acceleration
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
94%
Nokian WR Snowproof P
91%
Lateral guidance on snow
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
76%
Nokian WR Snowproof P
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Snow performance
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
83%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
74%

Dry

Dry
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
Nokian WR Snowproof P
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
Dry braking
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Nokian WR Snowproof P
92%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
72%
Dry handling
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
89%
Nokian WR Snowproof P
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
82%
Dry lane changing
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
80%
Nokian WR Snowproof P
93%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Dry steering response
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
Dry driving behavior
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
83%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
100%
Dry performance
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
56%

Wet

Wet
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
Nokian WR Snowproof P
64%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
Wet braking
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
95%
Nokian WR Snowproof P
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Wet handling
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
93%
Nokian WR Snowproof P
74%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
91%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
Nokian WR Snowproof P
60%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
74%
Aquaplaning - cross
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
84%
Nokian WR Snowproof P
35%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
74%
Wet circle cornering
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
Nokian WR Snowproof P
75%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
86%

Comfort

Comfort
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Nokian WR Snowproof P
92%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
85%
Exterior noise
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
79%
Nokian WR Snowproof P
92%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Comfort
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
83%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
81%
Interior noise
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
85%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%

Costs

Costs
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
Nokian WR Snowproof P
85%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
70%
Rolling resistance
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
87%
Nokian WR Snowproof P
92%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
75%
Mileage
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
64%
Nokian WR Snowproof P
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
56%
Price/value
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
60%
Nokian WR Snowproof P
62%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
68%

Ice

Ice
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Ice braking
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
79%
Ice lateral guidance
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison