18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook). Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (87%) than Hankook (83%). The first tyre test of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 was done in 2019, compared to 2015 when was the Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Automotorsport 2019 215/55 R17 test, where both the Blizzak LM-005 and the Winter i*cept evo2 W320 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 95% of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 has A wet grip rating, whereas 85% of Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 has C rating. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the Blizzak LM-005 is made in Italy/Hungary/Poland and Winter i*cept evo2 W320 is made in Hungary.

Test Profile

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Hankook
Winter i*cept evo2 W320
Number of tests
49
9
Best position
#1
#5
Average position
3.2
7.4
Latest test
2024
2019
Available sizes
213
124

Snow

Snow
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320
89%
Snow braking
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320
82%
Snow traction
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320
88%
Snow handling
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
72%
Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320
85%
Snow cornering
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
77%
Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320
87%
Snow acceleration
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
94%
Lateral guidance on snow
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
76%
Snow performance
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
83%
Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320
74%

Dry

Dry
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320
84%
Dry braking
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320
75%
Dry handling
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
89%
Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320
86%
Dry steering response
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
84%
Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320
90%
Dry lane changing
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
80%
Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320
80%
Dry driving behavior
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
83%
Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320
78%
Dry performance
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
77%
Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320
86%

Wet

Wet
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320
74%
Wet braking
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
95%
Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320
76%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320
79%
Wet handling
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
93%
Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320
73%
Aquaplaning - cross
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
84%
Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320
65%
Wet circle cornering
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320
75%

Comfort

Comfort
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320
66%
Exterior noise
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
79%
Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320
82%
Comfort
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
83%
Interior noise
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
85%
Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320
56%

Costs

Costs
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320
66%
Rolling resistance
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
87%
Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320
65%
Mileage
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
64%
Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320
64%
Price/value
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
60%
Fuel efficiency
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
89%
Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320
74%

Ice

Ice
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320
80%
Ice braking
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
79%
Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320
82%
Ice lateral guidance
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320
78%

Performance spider chart

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
AutomotorsportAutomotorsport
Winter
2019215/55 R17View

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison