Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Falken EuroWinter HS01 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870

Premium

Bridgestone

Blizzak LM-005

VS

2 mutual test(s) with detailed data

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

UltraGrip Performance 3

Winter

Test Profile

Blizzak LM-005

UltraGrip Performance+

EuroWinter HS01

WinterContact TS 870

Number of tests

49

23

17

Best position

#1

#5

#1

Average position

3.2

3.3

11.0

1.7

Latest test

2024

2025

2022

2025

Available sizes

213

176

359

80

Performance comparison

Averaged from 2 tests

Wet Performance

93%

Bridgestone

Blizzak LM-005

87%

GoodYear

UltraGrip Performance+

86%

Falken

EuroWinter HS01

91%

Continental

WinterContact TS 870

Wet Braking

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

95%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Falken EuroWinter HS01

84%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

91%

Wet Handling

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

89%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Falken EuroWinter HS01

87%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

91%

Wet Circle Cornering

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

95%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

90%

Falken EuroWinter HS01

93%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

96%

Aquaplaning Longitudinal

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

96%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Falken EuroWinter HS01

89%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

92%

Aquaplaning Cross

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

89%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

87%

Falken EuroWinter HS01

79%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

83%

Dry Performance

93%

Bridgestone

Blizzak LM-005

82%

GoodYear

UltraGrip Performance+

86%

Falken

EuroWinter HS01

84%

Continental

WinterContact TS 870

Dry Braking

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

93%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

82%

Falken EuroWinter HS01

86%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

84%

Snow Performance

79%

Bridgestone

Blizzak LM-005

95%

GoodYear

UltraGrip Performance+

86%

Falken

EuroWinter HS01

93%

Continental

WinterContact TS 870

Snow Braking

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

84%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

95%

Falken EuroWinter HS01

89%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

91%

Snow Traction

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

83%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

94%

Falken EuroWinter HS01

87%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

91%

Snow Handling

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

69%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

96%

Falken EuroWinter HS01

83%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

98%

Ice Performance

80%

Bridgestone

Blizzak LM-005

87%

GoodYear

UltraGrip Performance+

87%

Falken

EuroWinter HS01

91%

Continental

WinterContact TS 870

Ice Braking Abs

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

80%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

87%

Falken EuroWinter HS01

87%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

91%

Comfort & Noise

95%

Bridgestone

Blizzak LM-005

95%

GoodYear

UltraGrip Performance+

95%

Falken

EuroWinter HS01

97%

Continental

WinterContact TS 870

Noise Interior

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

95%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

95%

Falken EuroWinter HS01

95%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

97%

Economy

75%

Bridgestone

Blizzak LM-005

75%

GoodYear

UltraGrip Performance+

67%

Falken

EuroWinter HS01

97%

Continental

WinterContact TS 870

Rolling Resistance

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

75%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

75%

Falken EuroWinter HS01

67%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

97%

Tests used in comparison

Organization	Season	Year	Dimension
ADAC	Winter	2022	215/60 R16	View
Autoexpress	Winter	2020	205/55 R16	View

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

View general comparison

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Falken EuroWinter HS01 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870

Blizzak LM-005

UltraGrip Performance+

EuroWinter HS01

WinterContact TS 870

Test Profile

Performance comparison

Tests used in comparison

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison