18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Falken EuroWinter HS01 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870

4 mutual test(s) with detailed data

Test Profile

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Falken
EuroWinter HS01
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
Number of tests
49
23
17
Best position
#1
#5
#1
Average position
3.2
11.0
1.7
Latest test
2024
2022
2025
Available sizes
213
359
80

Performance comparison

Averaged from 4 tests

Wet Performance
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
91%
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Falken EuroWinter HS01
80%
Falken
EuroWinter HS01
Continental WinterContact TS 870
88%
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
Wet Braking
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
97%
Falken EuroWinter HS01
76%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
85%
Wet Handling
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
Falken EuroWinter HS01
85%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Wet Circle Cornering
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
92%
Falken EuroWinter HS01
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
85%
Falken EuroWinter HS01
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Aquaplaning Cross
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
Falken EuroWinter HS01
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
Dry Performance
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
89%
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Falken EuroWinter HS01
69%
Falken
EuroWinter HS01
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
Dry Braking
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
Falken EuroWinter HS01
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
77%
Dry Handling
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
92%
Falken EuroWinter HS01
77%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Dry Lane Change
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
100%
Falken EuroWinter HS01
60%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Dry Steering Reaction
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
80%
Falken EuroWinter HS01
60%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Snow Performance
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
87%
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Falken EuroWinter HS01
66%
Falken
EuroWinter HS01
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
Snow Braking
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
85%
Falken EuroWinter HS01
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
88%
Snow Traction
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
Falken EuroWinter HS01
70%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
85%
Snow Handling
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
Falken EuroWinter HS01
71%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
Snow Circle Cornering
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
100%
Falken EuroWinter HS01
42%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
92%
Ice Performance
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
80%
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Falken EuroWinter HS01
87%
Falken
EuroWinter HS01
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
Ice Braking Abs
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
80%
Falken EuroWinter HS01
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
Comfort & Noise
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Falken EuroWinter HS01
88%
Falken
EuroWinter HS01
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
Noise Exterior
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
79%
Falken EuroWinter HS01
85%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Noise Interior
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
95%
Falken EuroWinter HS01
95%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
97%
Ride Comfort
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
83%
Falken EuroWinter HS01
83%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
73%
Economy
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
66%
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Falken EuroWinter HS01
63%
Falken
EuroWinter HS01
Continental WinterContact TS 870
95%
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
Rolling Resistance
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
76%
Falken EuroWinter HS01
54%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
93%
Mileage
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
55%
Falken EuroWinter HS01
71%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
96%

Tests used in comparison

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
ADACADAC
Winter
2022215/60 R16View
AutobildAutobild
Winter
2021205/55 R16View
AutoMotorSportAutoMotorSport
Winter
2021195/55 R16View
AutoexpressAutoexpress
Winter
2020205/55 R16View

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

View general comparison

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison