18 Shops · 56,847+ Products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Hankook ION Evo

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005Premium
BridgestoneBridgestone

Blizzak LM-005

8.2
R14 – R22
Falken e.ZiexUpper-middle
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUVPremium
GoodyearGoodyear

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

9.2
R16 – R22
Hankook ION EvoPremium
HankookHankook

ION Evo

9.0
R17 – R22
Also compare with
PILOT ALPIN 5 SportContact 7 WinterContact TS 870

Test Profile

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Falken
e.Ziex
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Hankook
ION Evo
Number of tests
49
3
5
1
Best position
#1
#2
#1
#1
Average position
3.2
3.7
2.2
1.0
Latest test
2024
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
213
34
63
64

Snow

Snow
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
Snow braking
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
Snow traction
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
Snow handling
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
72%
Snow cornering
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
77%

Dry

Dry
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry braking
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Dry handling
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
89%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry lane changing
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
80%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Dry steering response
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
84%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Dry driving behavior
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
83%

Wet

Wet
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Wet braking
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
95%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Wet handling
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
93%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Aquaplaning - cross
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
84%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Wet circle cornering
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Comfort

Comfort
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Exterior noise
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
79%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Comfort
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
83%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Interior noise
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
100%

Costs

Costs
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Rolling resistance
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
87%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Mileage
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
64%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Price/value
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
60%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
87%
Hankook ION Evo
60%

Ice

Ice
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Ice braking
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
79%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison