18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Continental AllSeasonContact 2

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (87%) than Continental (83%). In this particular case, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 has a better rating of 88% compared to 82% of the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005. The first tyre test of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 was done in 2019, compared to 2023 when was the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 95% of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 has A wet grip rating, whereas 98% of Continental AllSeasonContact 2 has B rating. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the Blizzak LM-005 is made in Italy/Hungary/Poland and AllSeasonContact 2 is made in Czech Republic.

Test Profile

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Continental
AllSeasonContact 2
Number of tests
49
17
Best position
#1
#1
Average position
3.2
2.5
Latest test
2024
2025
Available sizes
213
284

Snow

Snow
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
82%
Snow traction
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
77%
Snow braking
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
81%
Snow handling
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
72%
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
84%
Snow cornering
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
77%
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
92%
Snow acceleration
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
94%
Lateral guidance on snow
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
76%
Snow performance
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
83%
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
84%

Dry

Dry
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
81%
Dry braking
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
76%
Dry handling
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
89%
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
77%
Dry steering response
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
84%
Dry lane changing
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
80%
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
100%
Dry driving behavior
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
83%
Dry performance
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
77%
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
78%

Wet

Wet
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
81%
Wet braking
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
95%
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
85%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
75%
Wet handling
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
93%
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
82%
Aquaplaning - cross
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
84%
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
73%
Wet circle cornering
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
88%

Comfort

Comfort
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
81%
Exterior noise
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
79%
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
85%
Comfort
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
83%
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
63%
Interior noise
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
85%
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
48%

Costs

Costs
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
77%
Rolling resistance
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
87%
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
76%
Mileage
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
64%
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
73%
Price/value
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
60%
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
55%
Fuel efficiency
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
89%
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
69%

Ice

Ice
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Ice braking
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
79%
Ice lateral guidance
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%

Performance spider chart

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison