18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Barum Polaris 5 vs. Laufenn I FIT Plus vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

3 mutual test(s) with detailed data

Test Profile

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Barum
Polaris 5
Laufenn
I FIT Plus
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Number of tests
49
13
6
23
Best position
#1
#9
#10
#1
Average position
3.2
15.2
14.5
6.7
Latest test
2024
2024
2023
2025
Available sizes
213
76
107

Performance comparison

Averaged from 3 tests

Wet Performance
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
88%
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Barum Polaris 5
64%
Barum
Polaris 5
Laufenn I FIT Plus
58%
Laufenn
I FIT Plus
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
74%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Wet Braking
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
97%
Barum Polaris 5
56%
Laufenn I FIT Plus
59%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
64%
Wet Handling
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
Barum Polaris 5
63%
Laufenn I FIT Plus
60%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
76%
Wet Circle Cornering
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
89%
Barum Polaris 5
72%
Laufenn I FIT Plus
59%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
70%
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
Barum Polaris 5
65%
Laufenn I FIT Plus
60%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
82%
Aquaplaning Cross
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
84%
Barum Polaris 5
65%
Laufenn I FIT Plus
51%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
80%
Dry Performance
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Barum Polaris 5
69%
Barum
Polaris 5
Laufenn I FIT Plus
71%
Laufenn
I FIT Plus
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
65%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Dry Braking
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
70%
Barum Polaris 5
61%
Laufenn I FIT Plus
75%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
Dry Handling
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
85%
Barum Polaris 5
76%
Laufenn I FIT Plus
67%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
63%
Snow Performance
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
85%
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Barum Polaris 5
73%
Barum
Polaris 5
Laufenn I FIT Plus
80%
Laufenn
I FIT Plus
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
87%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Snow Braking
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
Barum Polaris 5
74%
Laufenn I FIT Plus
74%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
90%
Snow Traction
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
85%
Barum Polaris 5
70%
Laufenn I FIT Plus
76%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
80%
Snow Handling
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
94%
Barum Polaris 5
78%
Laufenn I FIT Plus
86%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
90%
Snow Circle Cornering
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
83%
Barum Polaris 5
71%
Laufenn I FIT Plus
84%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
88%
Comfort & Noise
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
77%
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Barum Polaris 5
68%
Barum
Polaris 5
Laufenn I FIT Plus
76%
Laufenn
I FIT Plus
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
77%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Noise Exterior
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
77%
Barum Polaris 5
74%
Laufenn I FIT Plus
80%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
83%
Ride Comfort
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
76%
Barum Polaris 5
61%
Laufenn I FIT Plus
71%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
71%
Economy
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
70%
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Barum Polaris 5
74%
Barum
Polaris 5
Laufenn I FIT Plus
65%
Laufenn
I FIT Plus
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
74%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Rolling Resistance
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
79%
Barum Polaris 5
75%
Laufenn I FIT Plus
66%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
70%
Mileage
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
60%
Barum Polaris 5
73%
Laufenn I FIT Plus
64%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
78%

Tests used in comparison

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
AutobildAutobild
Winter
2023225/45 R18View
AutobildAutobild
Winter
2021205/55 R16View
AutobildAutobild
Winter
2020245/45 R18View

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

View general comparison

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison