18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Yokohama W.drive V905 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 860

Test Profile

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001
Yokohama
W.drive V905
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Continental
WinterContact TS 860
Number of tests
15
10
23
23
Best position
#4
#7
#1
#1
Average position
7.9
14.0
6.7
2.3
Latest test
2018
2019
2025
2021
Available sizes
132
8
107
76

Wet

Wet
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
79%
Yokohama W.drive V905
69%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
70%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
92%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
87%
Yokohama W.drive V905
67%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
86%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
90%
Wet braking
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
62%
Yokohama W.drive V905
70%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
89%
Wet handling
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
80%
Yokohama W.drive V905
70%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
94%
Aquaplaning - cross
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
80%
Yokohama W.drive V905
67%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
76%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
85%
Wet circle cornering
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
67%
Yokohama W.drive V905
67%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
65%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
90%
Wet performance
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
81%
Yokohama W.drive V905
68%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
64%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
91%

Dry

Dry
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
82%
Yokohama W.drive V905
91%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
84%
Dry braking
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
80%
Yokohama W.drive V905
88%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
82%
Dry performance
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
88%
Yokohama W.drive V905
86%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
80%
Dry driving behavior
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
82%
Yokohama W.drive V905
80%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
73%
Dry handling
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
77%
Yokohama W.drive V905
92%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
91%

Costs

Costs
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
77%
Yokohama W.drive V905
72%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
75%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
79%
Rolling resistance
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
78%
Yokohama W.drive V905
74%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
82%
Mileage
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
76%
Yokohama W.drive V905
62%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
77%
Fuel efficiency
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
79%
Yokohama W.drive V905
78%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
87%
Price/value
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
70%
Yokohama W.drive V905
79%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
68%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
68%

Snow

Snow
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
77%
Yokohama W.drive V905
74%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
91%
Snow braking
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
88%
Yokohama W.drive V905
70%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
90%
Snow handling
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
77%
Yokohama W.drive V905
76%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
90%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
87%
Snow traction
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
78%
Yokohama W.drive V905
77%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
91%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
88%

Comfort

Comfort
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
50%
Yokohama W.drive V905
59%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
79%
Exterior noise
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
75%
Yokohama W.drive V905
70%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
83%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
80%
Interior noise
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
33%
Yokohama W.drive V905
53%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
77%

Ice

Ice
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
80%
Yokohama W.drive V905
75%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
80%
Ice braking
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
82%
Yokohama W.drive V905
78%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
82%
Ice lateral guidance
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
78%
Yokohama W.drive V905
73%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
76%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Mutual tests

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
AutobildAutobild
Winter
2017225/50 R17View
AutobildAutobild
Winter
2017225/50 R17View

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison