Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Yokohama W.drive V905 vs. Barum Polaris 3 vs. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow vs. Continental WinterContact TS 860 vs. Dunlop Winter Sport 5

Premium

Bridgestone

Blizzak LM-001

R14 – R21

VS

Upper-middle

Yokohama

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

WinterContact TS 870

UltraGrip Performance 3

Test Profile

Blizzak LM-001

W.drive V905

Polaris 3

MP92 Sibir Snow

WinterContact TS 860

Winter Sport 5

Number of tests

15

10

8

23

48

Best position

#4

#7

#3

#12

#1

Average position

7.9

14.0

10.6

22.3

2.3

4.9

Latest test

2018

2019

2018

2021

2025

Available sizes

132

8

67

43

76

189

Wet

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

79%

Yokohama W.drive V905

69%

Barum Polaris 3

74%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

72%

Continental WinterContact TS 860

92%

Dunlop Winter Sport 5

77%

Wet handling

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

80%

Yokohama W.drive V905

70%

Barum Polaris 3

71%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

71%

Continental WinterContact TS 860

94%

Dunlop Winter Sport 5

82%

Aquaplaning - cross

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

80%

Yokohama W.drive V905

67%

Barum Polaris 3

71%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

65%

Continental WinterContact TS 860

85%

Dunlop Winter Sport 5

80%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

87%

Yokohama W.drive V905

67%

Barum Polaris 3

65%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

65%

Continental WinterContact TS 860

90%

Dunlop Winter Sport 5

71%

Wet braking

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

62%

Yokohama W.drive V905

70%

Barum Polaris 3

84%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

84%

Continental WinterContact TS 860

89%

Dunlop Winter Sport 5

75%

Wet circle cornering

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

67%

Yokohama W.drive V905

67%

Barum Polaris 3

79%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

68%

Continental WinterContact TS 860

90%

Dunlop Winter Sport 5

81%

Wet performance

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

81%

Yokohama W.drive V905

68%

Continental WinterContact TS 860

91%

Dunlop Winter Sport 5

85%

Dry

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

82%

Yokohama W.drive V905

91%

Barum Polaris 3

79%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

75%

Continental WinterContact TS 860

84%

Dunlop Winter Sport 5

77%

Dry braking

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

80%

Yokohama W.drive V905

88%

Barum Polaris 3

71%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

77%

Continental WinterContact TS 860

82%

Dunlop Winter Sport 5

66%

Dry driving behavior

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

82%

Yokohama W.drive V905

80%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

67%

Continental WinterContact TS 860

73%

Dunlop Winter Sport 5

77%

Dry handling

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

77%

Yokohama W.drive V905

92%

Barum Polaris 3

87%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

76%

Continental WinterContact TS 860

91%

Dunlop Winter Sport 5

77%

Dry performance

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

88%

Yokohama W.drive V905

86%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

77%

Continental WinterContact TS 860

80%

Dunlop Winter Sport 5

81%

Costs

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

77%

Yokohama W.drive V905

72%

Barum Polaris 3

79%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

78%

Continental WinterContact TS 860

79%

Dunlop Winter Sport 5

77%

Fuel efficiency

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

79%

Yokohama W.drive V905

78%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

83%

Continental WinterContact TS 860

87%

Dunlop Winter Sport 5

88%

Price/value

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

70%

Yokohama W.drive V905

79%

Barum Polaris 3

81%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

87%

Continental WinterContact TS 860

68%

Dunlop Winter Sport 5

67%

Rolling resistance

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

78%

Yokohama W.drive V905

74%

Barum Polaris 3

84%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

79%

Continental WinterContact TS 860

82%

Dunlop Winter Sport 5

82%

Mileage

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

76%

Yokohama W.drive V905

62%

Barum Polaris 3

68%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

70%

Continental WinterContact TS 860

77%

Dunlop Winter Sport 5

66%

Snow

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

77%

Yokohama W.drive V905

74%

Barum Polaris 3

87%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

78%

Continental WinterContact TS 860

91%

Dunlop Winter Sport 5

88%

Snow handling

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

77%

Yokohama W.drive V905

76%

Barum Polaris 3

87%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

82%

Continental WinterContact TS 860

87%

Dunlop Winter Sport 5

84%

Snow traction

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

78%

Yokohama W.drive V905

77%

Barum Polaris 3

89%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

75%

Continental WinterContact TS 860

88%

Dunlop Winter Sport 5

83%

Snow braking

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

88%

Yokohama W.drive V905

70%

Barum Polaris 3

87%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

78%

Continental WinterContact TS 860

90%

Dunlop Winter Sport 5

83%

Comfort

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

50%

Yokohama W.drive V905

59%

Barum Polaris 3

79%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

68%

Continental WinterContact TS 860

79%

Dunlop Winter Sport 5

72%

Exterior noise

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

75%

Yokohama W.drive V905

70%

Barum Polaris 3

79%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

81%

Continental WinterContact TS 860

80%

Dunlop Winter Sport 5

68%

Interior noise

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

33%

Yokohama W.drive V905

53%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

60%

Continental WinterContact TS 860

77%

Dunlop Winter Sport 5

76%

Ice

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

80%

Yokohama W.drive V905

75%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

79%

Continental WinterContact TS 860

80%

Dunlop Winter Sport 5

77%

Ice braking

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

82%

Yokohama W.drive V905

78%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

71%

Continental WinterContact TS 860

82%

Dunlop Winter Sport 5

69%

Ice lateral guidance

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

78%

Yokohama W.drive V905

73%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

89%

Continental WinterContact TS 860

76%

Dunlop Winter Sport 5

79%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Mutual tests

Organization	Season	Year	Dimension
Autobild	Winter	2017	225/50 R17	View
Autobild	Winter	2016	205/55 R16	View

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Yokohama W.drive V905 vs. Barum Polaris 3 vs. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow vs. Continental WinterContact TS 860 vs. Dunlop Winter Sport 5

Blizzak LM-001

W.drive V905

Polaris 3

MP92 Sibir Snow

WinterContact TS 860

Winter Sport 5

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Costs

Snow

Comfort

Ice

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Add to comparison