Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

Premium

Bridgestone

Blizzak LM-001

R14 – R21

VS

Upper-middle

Kumho

WinterCraft WP52+

UltraGrip Performance+

9.0

R15 – R22

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

WinterContact TS 870

UltraGrip Performance 3

Test Profile

Blizzak LM-001

WinterCraft WP52+

UltraGrip Performance+

Number of tests

15

3

23

Best position

#4

#1

Average position

7.9

4.3

3.3

Latest test

2018

2025

Available sizes

132

97

176

Wet

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

79%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

79%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Aquaplaning - cross

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

80%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

66%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

87%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

87%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Wet braking

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

62%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Wet handling

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

80%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

86%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Wet circle cornering

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

67%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

81%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

82%

Dry

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

82%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Dry braking

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

80%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Dry handling

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

77%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Costs

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

77%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

71%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Price/value

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

70%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

69%

Rolling resistance

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

78%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

69%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Mileage

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

76%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

69%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Snow

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

77%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

81%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Snow braking

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

88%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

80%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Snow handling

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

77%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

86%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Snow traction

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

78%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

76%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Comfort

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

50%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Exterior noise

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

75%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Interior noise

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

33%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Ice

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

80%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

Blizzak LM-001

WinterCraft WP52+

UltraGrip Performance+

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Costs

Snow

Comfort

Ice

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison