18 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Dimensions and prices
Buy %

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook). Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (87%) than Hankook (83%). But when it comes to comparing Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 and Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 was done in 2015, compared to 2016 when was the Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2017 225/50 R17 test, where both the Blizzak LM-001 and the Winter i*cept RS2 W452 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 72% of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 has B wet grip rating, whereas 90% of Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 has C rating. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the Blizzak LM-001 is made in Poland and Winter i*cept RS2 W452 is made in Korea.

#	Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 /0%	Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 /0%

Dimensions	R14 - R21	R13 - R17
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Premium

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Premium

Number of sizes available

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 132

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 88

Number of tests

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 21x

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 15x

Best position in test

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 2.

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 4.

Worst position in test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 18.

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 20.

Average position in tests

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 7.1

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 7.87

Year of the last test

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 2020

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 2018

Best rating in test

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Highly recommended

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Good

Worst rating in test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Good

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Satisfactory

Wet

(Overall rating)

Hankook
Winter i*cept RS2 W452

85.2%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

78.6%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 B

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 C

Dry

(Overall rating)

Hankook
Winter i*cept RS2 W452

83.7%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

81.7%

Snow

(Overall rating)

Hankook
Winter i*cept RS2 W452

90.1%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

77.4%

Costs

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

76.6%

Hankook
Winter i*cept RS2 W452

68.9%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 C

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 E

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Hankook
Winter i*cept RS2 W452

77.1%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

49.6%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 71 dB

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 ?

Ice

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

80%

Hankook
Winter i*cept RS2 W452

79%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Dimensions and prices

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 8 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

Autobild Winter tyre test 2017 225/50 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,2	25,9
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001	32,5	28,7
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452	35,9	28,6
Show test details

Autoexpress Winter tyre test 2017 225/45 R17

Name	Points total
Best values in test	100
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001	96,9
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452	99,8
Show test details

Autoexpress Winter tyre test 2016 205/55 R16

Name	Points total	Wet	Dry	Snow	Rolling resistance	Noise
Best values in test	100	96,9	99,8	99	100	100
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001	98,4	95,6	96	94,9	85,6	99,8
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452	97,6	92,1	99,6	95,9	86,1	99,1
Show test details

Autoklub ČR Winter tyre test 2016 205/55 R16

Name	Points total	Wet	Dry	Snow
Best values in test	101	100	103,3	100,3
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: Good	98,6	98,3	98,9	98,6
Hankook Winter icept RS2 W452 Rating: Satisfactory*	96,2	90,3	99,4	98,9
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2016 205/55 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	1-	2	2+	1
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: -	2	3+	2+	1-
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Rating: -	2-	2	2	2
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2016 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	34,2	25
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001	38,5	25,9
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452	39,1	26,2
Show test details

GTÜ Winter tyre test 2016 205/55 R16

Name	Points total	Wet	Dry	Snow	Rolling resistance	Noise
Best values in test	412	142	127	143	25	10
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: Recommended	341	100	114	127	19	8
Hankook Winter icept RS2 W452 Rating: Highly recommended*	363	104	118	141	16	10
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2016 185/65 R15

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Noise	Wear	Fuel consumption
Best values in test	1,8	1,9	1,7	2,2	2,8	1	1,5
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: -	2,8	2,6	1,9	2,9	3,6	2,5	2,0
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Rating: -	2,8	1,9	2,6	2,8	4,0	2,5	2,3
Show test details

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual Tests Available

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands