Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Falken EuroWinter HS02 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

Premium

Bridgestone

Blizzak LM-001

R14 – R21

VS

Upper-middle

Falken

EuroWinter HS02

UltraGrip Performance 3

9.5

R14 – R22

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

WinterContact TS 870

UltraGrip Performance 3

Test Profile

Blizzak LM-001

EuroWinter HS02

UltraGrip Performance 3

Number of tests

15

4

24

Best position

#4

#7

#1

Average position

7.9

12.3

2.7

Latest test

2018

2025

Available sizes

132

98

302

Wet

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

79%

Falken EuroWinter HS02

60%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

83%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

87%

Falken EuroWinter HS02

75%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

74%

Wet braking

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

62%

Falken EuroWinter HS02

62%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

80%

Wet handling

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

80%

Falken EuroWinter HS02

48%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

91%

Aquaplaning - cross

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

80%

Falken EuroWinter HS02

68%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

74%

Wet performance

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

81%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

84%

Wet circle cornering

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

67%

Falken EuroWinter HS02

63%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

86%

Dry

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

82%

Falken EuroWinter HS02

68%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

79%

Dry braking

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

80%

Falken EuroWinter HS02

71%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

72%

Dry performance

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

88%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

56%

Dry handling

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

77%

Falken EuroWinter HS02

65%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

82%

Costs

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

77%

Falken EuroWinter HS02

67%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

70%

Rolling resistance

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

75%

Mileage

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

76%

Falken EuroWinter HS02

67%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

56%

Snow

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

77%

Falken EuroWinter HS02

43%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

75%

Snow braking

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

88%

Falken EuroWinter HS02

49%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

77%

Snow handling

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

77%

Falken EuroWinter HS02

32%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

62%

Snow traction

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

78%

Falken EuroWinter HS02

56%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

79%

Comfort

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

50%

Falken EuroWinter HS02

76%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

85%

Exterior noise

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

75%

Falken EuroWinter HS02

72%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

80%

Interior noise

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

33%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

84%

Ice

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

80%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Falken EuroWinter HS02 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

Blizzak LM-001

EuroWinter HS02

UltraGrip Performance 3

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Costs

Snow

Comfort

Ice

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison