18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Barum Polaris 3 vs. Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

Test Profile

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001
Barum
Polaris 3
Uniroyal
MS plus 77
Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Number of tests
15
10
19
8
23
Best position
#4
#3
#3
#12
#1
Average position
7.9
10.6
11.2
22.3
6.7
Latest test
2018
2018
2021
2021
2025
Available sizes
132
67
76
43
107

Wet

Wet
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
79%
Barum Polaris 3
74%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
77%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
72%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
70%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
87%
Barum Polaris 3
65%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
83%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
65%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
86%
Wet braking
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
62%
Barum Polaris 3
84%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
72%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
84%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
Wet handling
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
80%
Barum Polaris 3
71%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
78%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
71%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
Aquaplaning - cross
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
80%
Barum Polaris 3
71%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
79%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
65%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
76%
Wet circle cornering
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
67%
Barum Polaris 3
79%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
74%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
68%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
65%

Dry

Dry
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
82%
Barum Polaris 3
79%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
74%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
75%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Dry braking
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
80%
Barum Polaris 3
71%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
71%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
77%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Dry handling
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
77%
Barum Polaris 3
87%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
78%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
76%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%

Costs

Costs
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
77%
Barum Polaris 3
79%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
77%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
78%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
75%
Rolling resistance
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
78%
Barum Polaris 3
84%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
82%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
79%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Mileage
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
76%
Barum Polaris 3
68%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
67%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
70%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Price/value
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
70%
Barum Polaris 3
81%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
75%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
87%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
68%

Snow

Snow
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
77%
Barum Polaris 3
87%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
81%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
78%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Snow braking
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
88%
Barum Polaris 3
87%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
84%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
78%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Snow handling
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
77%
Barum Polaris 3
87%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
80%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
82%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
90%
Snow traction
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
78%
Barum Polaris 3
89%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
80%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
75%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
91%

Comfort

Comfort
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
50%
Barum Polaris 3
79%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
73%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
68%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
79%
Exterior noise
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
75%
Barum Polaris 3
79%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
77%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
81%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
83%

Ice

Ice
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
80%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
75%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
79%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
81%
Ice braking
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
82%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
73%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
71%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
80%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Mutual tests

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
AutobildAutobild
Winter
2017225/50 R17View

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison