Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Falken e.Ziex

Premium

Bridgestone

Blizzak 6

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Blizzak 6

ION Evo

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

e.Ziex

Number of tests

14

1

3

5

3

Best position

#1

#2

#1

#2

Average position

3.6

1.0

3.3

2.2

3.7

Latest test

2025

2026

2025

Available sizes

188

64

40

63

34

Wet

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

78%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Wet braking

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

75%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Aquaplaning - cross

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

64%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

68%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Wet handling

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Wet circle cornering

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

83%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Snow

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

84%

Snow traction

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

74%

Snow braking

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

75%

Snow handling

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

84%

Dry

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

72%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dry braking

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

56%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Dry handling

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

82%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Dry performance

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

59%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

64%

Dry lane changing

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Dry steering response

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

Costs

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

68%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Rolling resistance

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

85%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Mileage

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

28%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Price/value

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

64%

Hankook ION Evo

60%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

87%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Comfort

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Exterior noise

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

66%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Comfort

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Offroad

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

79%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Falken e.Ziex

Blizzak 6

ION Evo

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

e.Ziex

Test Profile

Wet

Snow

Dry

Costs

Comfort

Offroad

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison