18 Shops · 56,847+ Products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Bridgestone Blizzak 6Premium
BridgestoneBridgestone

Blizzak 6

9.1
R16 – R22
Hankook ION EvoPremium
HankookHankook

ION Evo

9.0
R17 – R22
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.5
R15 – R21
Continental PremiumContact 7Premium
ContinentalContinental

PremiumContact 7

9.8
R16 – R21
Also compare with
Ventus Evo Pilot Sport 5 UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Hankook
ION Evo
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Number of tests
14
1
3
26
Best position
#1
#1
#2
#1
Average position
3.6
1.0
3.3
2.2
Latest test
2025
2025
2026
2026
Available sizes
188
64
40
66

Wet

Wet
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
78%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Aquaplaning - cross
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Wet braking
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
75%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
94%
Wet handling
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Wet circle cornering
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
Wet performance
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
45%

Snow

Snow
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
84%
Snow traction
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%
Snow braking
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
75%
Snow handling
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
84%
Snow cornering
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%

Dry

Dry
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Dry braking
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
56%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Dry handling
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Dry lane changing
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Dry performance
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
59%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%
Continental PremiumContact 7
35%
Dry steering response
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
96%

Costs

Costs
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Rolling resistance
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Mileage
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
28%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%
Price/value
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Hankook ION Evo
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%

Comfort

Comfort
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Exterior noise
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Continental PremiumContact 7
69%
Comfort
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Interior noise
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
88%

Offroad

Offroad
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison