Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs. Dunlop Winter Sport 5

Premium

Bridgestone

Blizzak 6

9.1

R16 – R22

VS

GT

1 mutual test(s) with detailed data

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

UltraGrip Performance 3

Winter

Test Profile

Blizzak 6

Radial Winter Pro 2 evo

WinterContact TS 870

Winter Sport 5

Number of tests

14

3

17

48

Best position

#1

#3

#1

Average position

3.6

9.7

1.7

4.9

Latest test

2025

2024

2025

Available sizes

188

32

80

189

Performance comparison

Wet Performance

84%

Bridgestone

Blizzak 6

59%

GT

Radial Winter Pro 2 evo

86%

Continental

WinterContact TS 870

72%

Dunlop

Winter Sport 5

Wet Braking

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

92%

GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo

77%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

69%

Dunlop Winter Sport 5

61%

Wet Handling

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

92%

GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo

53%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

84%

Dunlop Winter Sport 5

77%

Wet Circle Cornering

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

92%

GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo

59%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

92%

Dunlop Winter Sport 5

75%

Aquaplaning Longitudinal

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

73%

GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo

50%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

96%

Dunlop Winter Sport 5

57%

Aquaplaning Cross

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

73%

GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo

57%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

88%

Dunlop Winter Sport 5

88%

Dry Performance

81%

Bridgestone

Blizzak 6

60%

GT

Radial Winter Pro 2 evo

85%

Continental

WinterContact TS 870

64%

Dunlop

Winter Sport 5

Dry Braking

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

78%

GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo

69%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

78%

Dunlop Winter Sport 5

60%

Dry Handling

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

84%

GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo

51%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

92%

Dunlop Winter Sport 5

67%

Snow Performance

80%

Bridgestone

Blizzak 6

82%

GT

Radial Winter Pro 2 evo

87%

Continental

WinterContact TS 870

89%

Dunlop

Winter Sport 5

Snow Braking

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo

90%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

90%

Dunlop Winter Sport 5

90%

Snow Traction

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

88%

GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo

79%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

88%

Dunlop Winter Sport 5

96%

Snow Handling

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

69%

GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo

87%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

87%

Dunlop Winter Sport 5

78%

Snow Circle Cornering

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

82%

GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo

73%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

82%

Dunlop Winter Sport 5

91%

Comfort & Noise

57%

Bridgestone

Blizzak 6

76%

GT

Radial Winter Pro 2 evo

76%

Continental

WinterContact TS 870

57%

Dunlop

Winter Sport 5

Noise Exterior

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

57%

GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo

76%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

76%

Dunlop Winter Sport 5

57%

Economy

70%

Bridgestone

Blizzak 6

58%

GT

Radial Winter Pro 2 evo

90%

Continental

WinterContact TS 870

90%

Dunlop

Winter Sport 5

Rolling Resistance

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

65%

GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo

65%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

88%

Dunlop Winter Sport 5

88%

Mileage

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

75%

GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo

51%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

92%

Dunlop Winter Sport 5

92%

Tests used in comparison

Organization	Season	Year	Dimension
AUTOBILD	Winter	2024	205/55 R16	View

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

View general comparison

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs. Dunlop Winter Sport 5

Blizzak 6

Radial Winter Pro 2 evo

WinterContact TS 870

Winter Sport 5

Test Profile

Performance comparison

Tests used in comparison

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison