18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. Falken EuroWinter HS02 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

Test Profile

Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Falken
EuroWinter HS02
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
Number of tests
14
4
23
3
Best position
#1
#7
#1
#4
Average position
3.6
12.3
6.7
4.3
Latest test
2025
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
188
98
107
97

Wet

Wet
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
78%
Falken EuroWinter HS02
60%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
70%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
79%
Aquaplaning - cross
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Falken EuroWinter HS02
68%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
76%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
66%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Falken EuroWinter HS02
75%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
86%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Wet braking
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
75%
Falken EuroWinter HS02
62%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Wet handling
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Falken EuroWinter HS02
48%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
Wet circle cornering
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Falken EuroWinter HS02
63%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
65%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
Wet performance
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
64%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
82%

Snow

Snow
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
84%
Falken EuroWinter HS02
43%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
Snow traction
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%
Falken EuroWinter HS02
56%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
91%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
76%
Snow braking
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
75%
Falken EuroWinter HS02
49%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
80%
Snow handling
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
84%
Falken EuroWinter HS02
32%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
90%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
Snow cornering
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
89%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Snow performance
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
88%
Lateral guidance on snow
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
98%
Falken EuroWinter HS02
33%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
100%

Dry

Dry
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Falken EuroWinter HS02
68%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Dry braking
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
56%
Falken EuroWinter HS02
71%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Dry handling
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Falken EuroWinter HS02
65%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Dry lane changing
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Falken EuroWinter HS02
67%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
65%
Dry performance
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
59%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Dry steering response
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%
Falken EuroWinter HS02
67%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
78%

Costs

Costs
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Falken EuroWinter HS02
67%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
75%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
71%
Rolling resistance
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Mileage
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
28%
Falken EuroWinter HS02
67%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Price/value
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
68%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%

Comfort

Comfort
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Falken EuroWinter HS02
76%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
79%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Exterior noise
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Falken EuroWinter HS02
72%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
83%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Comfort
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Falken EuroWinter HS02
81%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
74%

Offroad

Offroad
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%

Ice

Ice
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
81%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison