Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

Premium

Bridgestone

Blizzak 6

VS

2 mutual test(s) with detailed data

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

WinterContact TS 870

UltraGrip Performance 3

Test Profile

Blizzak 6

EuroWinter HS02 Pro

UltraGrip Performance 3

WinterCraft WP52+

Number of tests

14

13

24

3

Best position

#1

#7

#1

#4

Average position

3.6

11.9

2.7

4.3

Latest test

2025

Available sizes

188

78

302

97

Performance comparison

Averaged from 2 tests

Wet Performance

74%

Bridgestone

Blizzak 6

73%

Falken

EuroWinter HS02 Pro

88%

GoodYear

UltraGrip Performance 3

78%

Kumho

WinterCraft WP52+

Wet Braking

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

68%

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

71%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

88%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

Wet Handling

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

69%

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

73%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

93%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

86%

Wet Circle Cornering

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

77%

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

93%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

81%

Aquaplaning Longitudinal

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

76%

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

75%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

76%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Aquaplaning Cross

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

79%

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

66%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

92%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

66%

Dry Performance

78%

Bridgestone

Blizzak 6

82%

Falken

EuroWinter HS02 Pro

74%

GoodYear

UltraGrip Performance 3

78%

Kumho

WinterCraft WP52+

Dry Braking

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

75%

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

88%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

80%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

Dry Handling

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

76%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

68%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Snow Performance

87%

Bridgestone

Blizzak 6

60%

Falken

EuroWinter HS02 Pro

81%

GoodYear

UltraGrip Performance 3

80%

Kumho

WinterCraft WP52+

Snow Braking

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

84%

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

61%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

80%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

80%

Snow Traction

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

87%

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

58%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

83%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

76%

Snow Handling

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

88%

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

53%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

81%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

86%

Snow Circle Cornering

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

88%

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

67%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

81%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

78%

Comfort & Noise

72%

Bridgestone

Blizzak 6

73%

Falken

EuroWinter HS02 Pro

80%

GoodYear

UltraGrip Performance 3

70%

Kumho

WinterCraft WP52+

Noise Exterior

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

72%

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

77%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

82%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Ride Comfort

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

72%

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

68%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

77%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

68%

Economy

87%

Bridgestone

Blizzak 6

61%

Falken

EuroWinter HS02 Pro

85%

GoodYear

UltraGrip Performance 3

69%

Kumho

WinterCraft WP52+

Rolling Resistance

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

77%

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

53%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

74%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

69%

Mileage

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

96%

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

69%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

96%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

69%

Tests used in comparison

Organization	Season	Year	Dimension
Autobild	Winter	2025	215/55 R17	View
Autobild	Winter	2025	225/40 R18	View

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

View general comparison

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

Blizzak 6

EuroWinter HS02 Pro

UltraGrip Performance 3

WinterCraft WP52+

Test Profile

Performance comparison

Tests used in comparison

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison