18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Sava Eskimo HP2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Sava
Eskimo HP2
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Number of tests
23
15
14
Best position
#1
#6
#1
Average position
6.7
15.5
3.6
Latest test
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
107
28
188

Dry

Dry
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Sava Eskimo HP2
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Sava Eskimo HP2
70%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
56%
Dry handling
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
Sava Eskimo HP2
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Dry lane changing
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
65%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Dry steering response
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%
Dry performance
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
Sava Eskimo HP2
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
59%
Dry driving behavior
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Sava Eskimo HP2
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
67%

Wet

Wet
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
70%
Sava Eskimo HP2
63%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
78%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
76%
Sava Eskimo HP2
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
Sava Eskimo HP2
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
75%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
Sava Eskimo HP2
60%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
86%
Sava Eskimo HP2
63%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
65%
Sava Eskimo HP2
59%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Wet performance
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
64%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%

Snow

Snow
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Sava Eskimo HP2
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
84%
Snow traction
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
91%
Sava Eskimo HP2
85%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%
Snow braking
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Sava Eskimo HP2
86%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
75%
Snow handling
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
90%
Sava Eskimo HP2
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
84%
Snow cornering
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
89%
Sava Eskimo HP2
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Snow performance
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Sava Eskimo HP2
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Lateral guidance on snow
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
100%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
98%

Comfort

Comfort
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
79%
Sava Eskimo HP2
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
83%
Sava Eskimo HP2
62%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Comfort
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Interior noise
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
81%
Sava Eskimo HP2
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%

Costs

Costs
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
75%
Sava Eskimo HP2
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Rolling resistance
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Sava Eskimo HP2
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Mileage
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Sava Eskimo HP2
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
28%
Price/value
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
68%
Sava Eskimo HP2
92%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%

Ice

Ice
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
81%
Sava Eskimo HP2
85%
Ice braking
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
80%
Sava Eskimo HP2
85%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Mutual tests

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
AutobildAutobild
Winter
2025225/40 R18View
AUTOBILDAUTOBILD
Winter
2024205/55 R16View

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison