18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Matador MP93 Nordicca

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BFGoodrich) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovakia (Matador). BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Matador is a brand that belongs to the Continental group. Generally, BFGoodrich winter tyres are slightly better rated (75%) than Matador (40%). In this particular case, the BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 has a better rating of 81% compared to 40% of the Matador MP93 Nordicca. The first tyre test of BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 was done in 2017, compared to 2022 when was the Matador MP93 Nordicca first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2023 225/45 R18 test, where both the G-FORCE WINTER 2 and the MP93 Nordicca were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 has B wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Matador MP93 Nordicca has C rating. We also know where G-FORCE WINTER 2 is made - Romania/Poland.

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Matador
MP93 Nordicca
Number of tests
23
4
Best position
#1
#11
Average position
6.7
23.8
Latest test
2025
2025
Available sizes
107
92

Wet

Wet
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
70%
Matador MP93 Nordicca
39%

Dry

Dry
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Matador MP93 Nordicca
56%

Snow

Snow
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Matador MP93 Nordicca
49%

Comfort

Comfort
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
79%

Costs

Costs
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
75%

Ice

Ice
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
81%
Matador MP93 Nordicca
30%

Performance spider chart

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Mutual tests

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
AutobildAutobild
Winter
2023225/45 R18View
AutobildAutobild
Winter
2022215/55 R17View

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison