18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Kleber KRISALP HP3 vs. Dunlop Winter vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P

1 mutual test(s) with detailed data

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Kleber
KRISALP HP3
Dunlop
Winter
Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
Number of tests
23
28
2
29
Best position
#1
#2
#1
#1
Average position
6.7
8.0
1.5
3.7
Latest test
2025
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
107
115
65
178

Performance comparison

Wet Performance
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Kleber KRISALP HP3
72%
Kleber
KRISALP HP3
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
74%
Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
Wet Braking
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
59%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
59%
Dunlop Winter
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
59%
Wet Handling
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
59%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
67%
Dunlop Winter
67%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
67%
Wet Circle Cornering
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
55%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
63%
Dunlop Winter
63%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
71%
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
90%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
90%
Dunlop Winter
71%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
Aquaplaning Cross
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
82%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
82%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
91%
Dry Performance
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Kleber KRISALP HP3
57%
Kleber
KRISALP HP3
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
82%
Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
Dry Braking
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
57%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
Dry Handling
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
64%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
56%
Dunlop Winter
64%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
82%
Snow Performance
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
96%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Kleber KRISALP HP3
94%
Kleber
KRISALP HP3
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
83%
Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
Snow Braking
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
96%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
96%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
Snow Traction
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
96%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
96%
Dunlop Winter
96%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
87%
Snow Handling
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
96%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
88%
Dunlop Winter
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
79%
Snow Circle Cornering
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
96%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
96%
Dunlop Winter
96%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
88%
Comfort & Noise
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Kleber KRISALP HP3
60%
Kleber
KRISALP HP3
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
83%
Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
Noise Exterior
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
60%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
Ride Comfort
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
60%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
87%
Economy
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Kleber KRISALP HP3
62%
Kleber
KRISALP HP3
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
79%
Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
Rolling Resistance
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
73%
Dunlop Winter
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
88%
Mileage
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
60%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
51%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
69%

Tests used in comparison

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
AutobildAutobild
Winter
2025225/40 R18View

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

View general comparison

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison