18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+
Falken
e.Ziex
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Number of tests
23
23
3
14
Best position
#1
#1
#2
#1
Average position
6.7
3.3
3.7
3.6
Latest test
2025
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
107
176
34
188

Dry

Dry
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
56%
Dry handling
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Dry steering response
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
79%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%
Dry lane changing
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
65%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
74%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Dry performance
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
59%

Wet

Wet
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
70%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
78%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
76%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
75%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
86%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
65%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
82%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%

Snow

Snow
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
84%
Snow traction
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
91%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%
Snow braking
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
75%
Snow handling
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
84%
Snow cornering
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
89%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Snow performance
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%

Comfort

Comfort
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
83%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Comfort
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Interior noise
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%

Costs

Costs
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
75%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Rolling resistance
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Mileage
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
28%
Price/value
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
68%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
69%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%

Ice

Ice
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Ice braking
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison