Comparison: BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Viking WinTech vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

Upper-middle

BFGoodrich

Advantage

VS

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

WinterContact TS 870

Ventus Evo

Test Profile

Advantage

WinTech

Ventus Evo

UltraGrip Performance+

Number of tests

14

6

3

23

Best position

#8

#11

#2

#1

Average position

13.4

20.8

3.3

Latest test

2026

2024

2026

2025

Available sizes

153

59

60

176

Wet

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Viking WinTech

55%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Aquaplaning - cross

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

Viking WinTech

46%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

87%

Wet braking

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Viking WinTech

61%

Hankook Ventus Evo

95%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Viking WinTech

52%

Hankook Ventus Evo

81%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Wet handling

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

Viking WinTech

52%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Wet circle cornering

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

Viking WinTech

62%

Hankook Ventus Evo

96%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

82%

Dry

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Viking WinTech

63%

Hankook Ventus Evo

83%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Dry braking

BFGoodrich Advantage

76%

Viking WinTech

62%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Dry handling

BFGoodrich Advantage

80%

Viking WinTech

59%

Hankook Ventus Evo

90%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Dry lane changing

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

74%

Comfort

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

Viking WinTech

66%

Hankook Ventus Evo

75%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Exterior noise

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Viking WinTech

61%

Hankook Ventus Evo

73%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Comfort

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

79%

Interior noise

BFGoodrich Advantage

81%

Viking WinTech

71%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Costs

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Viking WinTech

72%

Hankook Ventus Evo

80%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Rolling resistance

BFGoodrich Advantage

66%

Hankook Ventus Evo

86%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Mileage

BFGoodrich Advantage

63%

Viking WinTech

67%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Price/value

BFGoodrich Advantage

65%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

69%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Viking WinTech vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

Advantage

WinTech

Ventus Evo

UltraGrip Performance+

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison