18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparator | Contact Us

Comparison: BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Viking WinTech vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

BFGoodrich Advantage

BFGoodrich

Advantage

VS

Viking WinTech

Viking

WinTech

Hankook Ventus Evo

Hankook

Ventus Evo

Also compare with

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

BFGoodrich

Advantage

Viking

WinTech

Hankook

Ventus Evo

Number of tests

14

6

3

Best position

#8

#11

#2

Average position

13.4

20.8

3.3

Latest test

2026

2024

2026

Available sizes

153

59

60

Wet

Wet

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Viking WinTech

55%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Aquaplaning - cross

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

Viking WinTech

46%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Wet braking

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Viking WinTech

61%

Hankook Ventus Evo

95%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Viking WinTech

52%

Hankook Ventus Evo

81%

Wet handling

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

Viking WinTech

52%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Wet circle cornering

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

Viking WinTech

62%

Hankook Ventus Evo

96%

Dry

Dry

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Viking WinTech

63%

Hankook Ventus Evo

83%

Dry braking

BFGoodrich Advantage

76%

Viking WinTech

62%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

Dry handling

BFGoodrich Advantage

80%

Viking WinTech

59%

Hankook Ventus Evo

90%

Comfort

Comfort

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

Viking WinTech

66%

Hankook Ventus Evo

75%

Exterior noise

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Viking WinTech

61%

Hankook Ventus Evo

73%

Comfort

BFGoodrich Advantage

87%

Viking WinTech

50%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

Costs

Costs

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Viking WinTech

72%

Hankook Ventus Evo

80%

Rolling resistance

BFGoodrich Advantage

66%

Hankook Ventus Evo

86%

Mileage

BFGoodrich Advantage

63%

Viking WinTech

67%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison