18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Viking WinTech vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
Advantage
Viking
WinTech
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Number of tests
14
6
3
3
Best position
#8
#11
#2
#2
Average position
13.4
20.8
3.7
3.3
Latest test
2026
2024
2025
2026
Available sizes
153
59
34
60

Wet

Wet
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Viking WinTech
55%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Viking WinTech
46%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Viking WinTech
61%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook Ventus Evo
95%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Viking WinTech
52%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Viking WinTech
52%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Viking WinTech
62%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
96%

Dry

Dry
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Viking WinTech
63%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook Ventus Evo
83%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Viking WinTech
62%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
76%
Dry handling
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Viking WinTech
59%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
90%

Comfort

Comfort
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Viking WinTech
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
75%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Viking WinTech
61%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
73%
Comfort
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
Viking WinTech
50%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
76%

Costs

Costs
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Viking WinTech
72%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
80%
Rolling resistance
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook Ventus Evo
86%
Mileage
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Viking WinTech
67%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison