18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparator | Contact Us

Comparison: BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Viking WinTech vs. Dunlop Winter

BFGoodrich Advantage

BFGoodrich

Advantage

VS

Viking WinTech

Viking

WinTech

Dunlop Winter

Dunlop

Winter

Also compare with

WinterContact TS 870

Ventus Evo

Test Profile

BFGoodrich

Advantage

Viking

WinTech

Dunlop

Winter

Number of tests

14

6

2

Best position

#8

#11

#1

Average position

13.4

20.8

1.5

Latest test

2026

2024

2025

Available sizes

153

59

65

Wet

Wet

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Viking WinTech

55%

Dunlop Winter

73%

Wet braking

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Viking WinTech

61%

Dunlop Winter

84%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Viking WinTech

52%

Dunlop Winter

71%

Wet handling

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

Viking WinTech

52%

Dunlop Winter

67%

Aquaplaning - cross

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

Viking WinTech

46%

Dunlop Winter

73%

Wet circle cornering

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

Viking WinTech

62%

Dunlop Winter

63%

Wet performance

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

Viking WinTech

60%

Dunlop Winter

73%

Dry

Dry

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Viking WinTech

63%

Dunlop Winter

69%

Dry braking

BFGoodrich Advantage

76%

Viking WinTech

62%

Dunlop Winter

73%

Dry handling

BFGoodrich Advantage

80%

Viking WinTech

59%

Dunlop Winter

64%

Dry performance

BFGoodrich Advantage

70%

Viking WinTech

79%

Dunlop Winter

78%

Comfort

Comfort

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

Viking WinTech

66%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Exterior noise

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Viking WinTech

61%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Comfort

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Costs

Costs

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Viking WinTech

72%

Dunlop Winter

83%

Rolling resistance

BFGoodrich Advantage

66%

Dunlop Winter

81%

Mileage

BFGoodrich Advantage

63%

Viking WinTech

67%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison