18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Sava Intensa UHP 2 vs. Michelin Primacy 5

Today, we are comparing two summer tyre models, the BFGoodrich Advantage and the Sava Intensa UHP 2 to give you an in-depth view, backed by test data, so you can make an informed purchase decision. Both of these models are from reputable manufacturers, BFGoodrich and Sava, known for their commitment to quality and innovation.


Starting with the BFGoodrich Advantage, this tyre scores a solid 68% in our ratings. It impresses with excellent stability and short braking distances on dry surfaces, making it an ideal summer tyre. Not to mention, users often compliment its pleasantly quiet rolling comfort. Nevertheless, there were some weaknesses observed during wet conditions, reflected by understeering handling behaviour and extended braking distances. It is worth mentioning that this tyre model hasn't been replaced by a newer model. Overall, the BFGoodrich Advantage came in 20th position out of 51 tyres in the Autobild test.


On the other side, the Sava Intensa UHP 2, which replaced the previous Sava Intensa UHP variant, is almost neck-to-neck with the BFGoodrich Advantage with an overall rating of 67%. This tyre stands out with its superior safety reserves during aquaplaning and stable driving behaviour on dry tracks. Moreover, it boasts short wet and dry braking distances and good comfort. Paired with its competitive pricing, it presents an appealing proposition for summer use. In terms of limitations, it presents a slightly restricted tread life. In the Autobild test, the Sava Intensa UHP 2 ended up in a higher 15th position out of 51 tyres.


Summing up, both the BFGoodrich Advantage and the Sava Intensa UHP 2 offer a balanced set of features and decent performance overall. However, if wet conditions are a crucial factor for your driving experience, you might prefer the Sava Intensa UHP 2 thanks to its better aquaplaning reserves. On the contrary, if you predominantly drive on dry roads and value rolling comfort, the BFGoodrich Advantage would be a suitable pick. Nevertheless, it's advisable to choose in accordance with your specific driving conditions, preferences, and budget.

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
Advantage
Sava
Intensa UHP 2
Michelin
Primacy 5
Number of tests
14
15
3
Best position
#8
#2
#1
Average position
13.4
13.3
4.7
Latest test
2026
2026
2026
Available sizes
153
76
126

Wet

Wet
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Sava Intensa UHP 2
76%
Michelin Primacy 5
58%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Sava Intensa UHP 2
67%
Michelin Primacy 5
65%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Sava Intensa UHP 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
51%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Sava Intensa UHP 2
66%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Sava Intensa UHP 2
84%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Sava Intensa UHP 2
77%
Wet performance
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Sava Intensa UHP 2
67%
Michelin Primacy 5
79%

Dry

Dry
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Sava Intensa UHP 2
85%
Michelin Primacy 5
73%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Sava Intensa UHP 2
82%
Michelin Primacy 5
76%
Dry handling
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Sava Intensa UHP 2
80%
Michelin Primacy 5
69%
Dry performance
BFGoodrich Advantage
70%
Sava Intensa UHP 2
85%
Michelin Primacy 5
88%

Comfort

Comfort
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Sava Intensa UHP 2
72%
Michelin Primacy 5
1%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Sava Intensa UHP 2
77%
Comfort
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Sava Intensa UHP 2
76%
Interior noise
BFGoodrich Advantage
81%
Sava Intensa UHP 2
73%
Michelin Primacy 5
1%

Costs

Costs
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Sava Intensa UHP 2
77%
Michelin Primacy 5
63%
Rolling resistance
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Sava Intensa UHP 2
74%
Michelin Primacy 5
63%
Mileage
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Sava Intensa UHP 2
72%
Price/value
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
Sava Intensa UHP 2
88%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison