18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Sava Intensa UHP 2

1 mutual test(s) with detailed data

Today, we are comparing two summer tyre models, the BFGoodrich Advantage and the Sava Intensa UHP 2 to give you an in-depth view, backed by test data, so you can make an informed purchase decision. Both of these models are from reputable manufacturers, BFGoodrich and Sava, known for their commitment to quality and innovation.


Starting with the BFGoodrich Advantage, this tyre scores a solid 68% in our ratings. It impresses with excellent stability and short braking distances on dry surfaces, making it an ideal summer tyre. Not to mention, users often compliment its pleasantly quiet rolling comfort. Nevertheless, there were some weaknesses observed during wet conditions, reflected by understeering handling behaviour and extended braking distances. It is worth mentioning that this tyre model hasn't been replaced by a newer model. Overall, the BFGoodrich Advantage came in 20th position out of 51 tyres in the Autobild test.


On the other side, the Sava Intensa UHP 2, which replaced the previous Sava Intensa UHP variant, is almost neck-to-neck with the BFGoodrich Advantage with an overall rating of 67%. This tyre stands out with its superior safety reserves during aquaplaning and stable driving behaviour on dry tracks. Moreover, it boasts short wet and dry braking distances and good comfort. Paired with its competitive pricing, it presents an appealing proposition for summer use. In terms of limitations, it presents a slightly restricted tread life. In the Autobild test, the Sava Intensa UHP 2 ended up in a higher 15th position out of 51 tyres.


Summing up, both the BFGoodrich Advantage and the Sava Intensa UHP 2 offer a balanced set of features and decent performance overall. However, if wet conditions are a crucial factor for your driving experience, you might prefer the Sava Intensa UHP 2 thanks to its better aquaplaning reserves. On the contrary, if you predominantly drive on dry roads and value rolling comfort, the BFGoodrich Advantage would be a suitable pick. Nevertheless, it's advisable to choose in accordance with your specific driving conditions, preferences, and budget.

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
Advantage
Sava
Intensa UHP 2
Number of tests
14
15
Best position
#8
#2
Average position
13.4
13.3
Latest test
2026
2026
Available sizes
153
76

Performance comparison

Wet Performance
BFGoodrich Advantage
62%
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Sava Intensa UHP 2
76%
Sava
Intensa UHP 2
Wet Braking
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Sava Intensa UHP 2
73%
Wet Handling
BFGoodrich Advantage
55%
Sava Intensa UHP 2
63%
Wet Circle Cornering
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Sava Intensa UHP 2
71%
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Sava Intensa UHP 2
86%
Aquaplaning Cross
BFGoodrich Advantage
60%
Sava Intensa UHP 2
87%
Dry Performance
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Sava Intensa UHP 2
77%
Sava
Intensa UHP 2
Dry Braking
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Sava Intensa UHP 2
79%
Dry Handling
BFGoodrich Advantage
75%
Sava Intensa UHP 2
75%
Comfort & Noise
BFGoodrich Advantage
81%
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Sava Intensa UHP 2
71%
Sava
Intensa UHP 2
Noise Exterior
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Sava Intensa UHP 2
66%
Ride Comfort
BFGoodrich Advantage
86%
Sava Intensa UHP 2
76%
Economy
BFGoodrich Advantage
64%
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Sava Intensa UHP 2
60%
Sava
Intensa UHP 2
Rolling Resistance
BFGoodrich Advantage
67%
Sava Intensa UHP 2
67%
Mileage
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Sava Intensa UHP 2
53%

Performance spider chart

Tests used in comparison

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
AutobildAutobild
Summer
2022215/55 R17View

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

View general comparison

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison