Comparison: BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Sava Intensa HP2 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

When it comes to tyres, every detail matters - and we're here to help you make an informed choice. The aim of this comparison is to explore the quality, performance and other vital traits of two summer tyres: The BFGoodrich Advantage and the Sava Intensa HP2.

Let's kick off this comparison with the BFGoodrich Advantage. Scoring an overall rating of 66%, this tyre has been appreciated for its comfort and dry handling, standing out in Autobild's test where it took the 18th position out of 53 tyres. Further, it scored points for its dynamic dry handling, quiet rolling, low resistance to rolling and cost-effectiveness, although it was found to understeer in the wet.

On the other hand, we have the Sava Intensa HP2, successor to the Sava Intensa HP. Despite having a slightly lower overall rating at 65%, the Sava Intensa HP2 made its mark by securing the 18th position out of 50 in the ADAC testing, ahead of the BFGoodrich Advantage. This tyre was lauded for its efficiency and lightness, although it didn't perform quite as well in terms of driving safety and both dry and wet handling persistence. Environmental performance and endurance may also be areas for improvement.

Made by BFGoodrich and Sava respectively, both tyres embody the commitment to quality and innovation that these manufacturers uphold.

Verdict: Upon considering all these factors, it can be said that each tyre has its strengths and weaknesses. If comfort, dry handling and pricing are your primal concerns, the BFGoodrich Advantage might serve you well. However, if you value efficiency, lightness and higher relative ranking in tests, your search could end with the Sava Intensa HP2. As always, remember that the right tyre for you is one that fits your specific driving needs and conditions the best. Drive safely!