18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Sava Eskimo HP2 vs. Dunlop Winter

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
Advantage
Sava
Eskimo HP2
Dunlop
Winter
Number of tests
14
15
2
Best position
#8
#6
#1
Average position
13.4
15.5
1.5
Latest test
2026
2025
2025
Available sizes
153
28
65

Wet

Wet
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Sava Eskimo HP2
63%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Sava Eskimo HP2
60%
Dunlop Winter
67%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Sava Eskimo HP2
69%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Sava Eskimo HP2
67%
Dunlop Winter
84%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Sava Eskimo HP2
63%
Dunlop Winter
71%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Sava Eskimo HP2
59%
Dunlop Winter
63%

Dry

Dry
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Sava Eskimo HP2
71%
Dunlop Winter
69%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Sava Eskimo HP2
70%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Dry handling
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Sava Eskimo HP2
72%
Dunlop Winter
64%
Dry performance
BFGoodrich Advantage
70%
Sava Eskimo HP2
72%
Dunlop Winter
78%
Dry driving behavior
BFGoodrich Advantage
70%
Sava Eskimo HP2
74%

Comfort

Comfort
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Sava Eskimo HP2
72%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Sava Eskimo HP2
62%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Comfort
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Sava Eskimo HP2
83%
Dunlop Winter
87%

Costs

Costs
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Sava Eskimo HP2
83%
Dunlop Winter
83%
Rolling resistance
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Sava Eskimo HP2
83%
Dunlop Winter
81%
Mileage
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Sava Eskimo HP2
76%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Price/value
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
Sava Eskimo HP2
92%
Dunlop Winter
84%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison