Comparison: BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Petlas Snowmaster W651 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Upper-middle

BFGoodrich

Advantage

VS

Snowmaster W651

Ventus Evo

9.8

R17 – R22

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

WinterContact TS 870

Ventus Evo

Test Profile

Advantage

Snowmaster W651

Ventus Evo

Number of tests

14

6

3

Best position

#8

#9

#2

Average position

13.4

38.0

3.3

Latest test

2026

2023

2026

Available sizes

153

11

60

Wet

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Petlas Snowmaster W651

37%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Wet handling

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

Petlas Snowmaster W651

4%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Aquaplaning - cross

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

Petlas Snowmaster W651

33%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Wet braking

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Petlas Snowmaster W651

43%

Hankook Ventus Evo

95%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Petlas Snowmaster W651

66%

Hankook Ventus Evo

81%

Wet circle cornering

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

Hankook Ventus Evo

96%

Dry

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Petlas Snowmaster W651

63%

Hankook Ventus Evo

83%

Dry braking

BFGoodrich Advantage

76%

Petlas Snowmaster W651

81%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

Dry handling

BFGoodrich Advantage

80%

Petlas Snowmaster W651

44%

Hankook Ventus Evo

90%

Comfort

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

Hankook Ventus Evo

75%

Exterior noise

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Hankook Ventus Evo

73%

Costs

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Hankook Ventus Evo

80%

Rolling resistance

BFGoodrich Advantage

66%

Hankook Ventus Evo

86%

Mileage

BFGoodrich Advantage

63%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Petlas Snowmaster W651 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Advantage

Snowmaster W651

Ventus Evo

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison