18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Nexen N Fera Primus vs. Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

The BFGoodrich Advantage and the Nexen N Fera Primus are two tyres that have been tested extensively across various platforms. Both are designated as summer tyres, making them suitable for dry and wet conditions. However, the similarities don't extend far into actual performance.


The BFGoodrich Advantage, manufactured by BFGoodrich, is known for its excellent dry handling, quiet rolling noise, low rolling resistance, and competitive pricing. Its strengths lie broadly in comfort and stability on dry terrain, which is a significant advantage for speed enthusiasts and everyday users alike. Despite these plus points, it falls short in wet conditions, with notable understeer, which affects its overall rating, leaving it with an overall score of 68%.


On the other hand, the Nexen N Fera Primus, a product of Nexen, stands tall with a superior rating of 71%. Its high acquaplaning quality, secure wet handling, short wet braking distances, and wallet-friendly price point make it an appealing choice. The tyre's standout feature is its ability to perform admirably in both dry and particularly in wet conditions, a factor that had it ranking high in test results. However, it too has limitations. It tends to understeer in dry conditions and has a significantly restricted lifespan allied with a high rolling resistance.


In mutual test comparisons, the Nexen N Fera Primus consistently outperforms the BFGoodrich Advantage. For example, in the Autobild tests, the Nexen Tyre claimed the 10th position out of 50, while the BFGoodrich tyre trailed behind at 20th among 51 tyres tested. Similar results were observed in the ADAC tests, with Nexen securing the 10th position compared to BFGoodrich's 21st position.


In conclusion, while both tyres have their strengths and weaknesses, the Nexen N Fera Primus edges past the BFGoodrich Advantage due to its superior wet handling and aquaplaning qualities. However, if ultimate comfort in dry conditions and noise reduction tops your considerations, the BFGoodrich Advantage might be a better choice.

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
Advantage
Nexen
N Fera Primus
Pirelli
P ZERO PZ4
Number of tests
14
6
14
Best position
#8
#10
#2
Average position
13.4
12.7
5.5
Latest test
2026
2024
2025
Available sizes
153
60
706

Wet

Wet
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Nexen N Fera Primus
73%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
83%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Nexen N Fera Primus
77%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
68%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Nexen N Fera Primus
76%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
78%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Nexen N Fera Primus
79%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
76%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Nexen N Fera Primus
64%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
90%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Nexen N Fera Primus
70%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
89%

Dry

Dry
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Nexen N Fera Primus
62%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
77%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Nexen N Fera Primus
72%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
80%
Dry handling
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Nexen N Fera Primus
53%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
82%
Dry lane changing
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
85%

Comfort

Comfort
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Nexen N Fera Primus
65%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
75%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Nexen N Fera Primus
66%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
77%
Comfort
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
Nexen N Fera Primus
53%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
74%

Costs

Costs
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Nexen N Fera Primus
59%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
52%
Rolling resistance
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Nexen N Fera Primus
59%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
59%
Mileage
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Nexen N Fera Primus
49%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
49%
Price/value
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
Nexen N Fera Primus
77%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
28%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison