18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Nexen N Fera Primus vs. Firestone Roadhawk

1 mutual test(s) with detailed data

The BFGoodrich Advantage and the Nexen N Fera Primus are two tyres that have been tested extensively across various platforms. Both are designated as summer tyres, making them suitable for dry and wet conditions. However, the similarities don't extend far into actual performance.


The BFGoodrich Advantage, manufactured by BFGoodrich, is known for its excellent dry handling, quiet rolling noise, low rolling resistance, and competitive pricing. Its strengths lie broadly in comfort and stability on dry terrain, which is a significant advantage for speed enthusiasts and everyday users alike. Despite these plus points, it falls short in wet conditions, with notable understeer, which affects its overall rating, leaving it with an overall score of 68%.


On the other hand, the Nexen N Fera Primus, a product of Nexen, stands tall with a superior rating of 71%. Its high acquaplaning quality, secure wet handling, short wet braking distances, and wallet-friendly price point make it an appealing choice. The tyre's standout feature is its ability to perform admirably in both dry and particularly in wet conditions, a factor that had it ranking high in test results. However, it too has limitations. It tends to understeer in dry conditions and has a significantly restricted lifespan allied with a high rolling resistance.


In mutual test comparisons, the Nexen N Fera Primus consistently outperforms the BFGoodrich Advantage. For example, in the Autobild tests, the Nexen Tyre claimed the 10th position out of 50, while the BFGoodrich tyre trailed behind at 20th among 51 tyres tested. Similar results were observed in the ADAC tests, with Nexen securing the 10th position compared to BFGoodrich's 21st position.


In conclusion, while both tyres have their strengths and weaknesses, the Nexen N Fera Primus edges past the BFGoodrich Advantage due to its superior wet handling and aquaplaning qualities. However, if ultimate comfort in dry conditions and noise reduction tops your considerations, the BFGoodrich Advantage might be a better choice.

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
Advantage
Nexen
N Fera Primus
Firestone
Roadhawk
Number of tests
14
6
21
Best position
#8
#10
#2
Average position
13.4
12.7
11.9
Latest test
2026
2024
2024
Available sizes
153
60
164

Performance comparison

Wet Performance
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Nexen N Fera Primus
71%
Nexen
N Fera Primus
Firestone Roadhawk
75%
Firestone
Roadhawk
Wet Braking
BFGoodrich Advantage
64%
Nexen N Fera Primus
73%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Wet Handling
BFGoodrich Advantage
59%
Nexen N Fera Primus
84%
Firestone Roadhawk
84%
Wet Circle Cornering
BFGoodrich Advantage
59%
Nexen N Fera Primus
75%
Firestone Roadhawk
75%
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Nexen N Fera Primus
57%
Firestone Roadhawk
76%
Aquaplaning Cross
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Nexen N Fera Primus
66%
Firestone Roadhawk
76%
Dry Performance
BFGoodrich Advantage
74%
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Nexen N Fera Primus
66%
Nexen
N Fera Primus
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Firestone
Roadhawk
Dry Braking
BFGoodrich Advantage
71%
Nexen N Fera Primus
71%
Firestone Roadhawk
81%
Dry Handling
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Nexen N Fera Primus
61%
Firestone Roadhawk
84%
Comfort & Noise
BFGoodrich Advantage
82%
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Nexen N Fera Primus
73%
Nexen
N Fera Primus
Firestone Roadhawk
56%
Firestone
Roadhawk
Noise Exterior
BFGoodrich Advantage
82%
Nexen N Fera Primus
73%
Firestone Roadhawk
56%
Economy
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Nexen N Fera Primus
56%
Nexen
N Fera Primus
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Firestone
Roadhawk
Rolling Resistance
BFGoodrich Advantage
84%
Nexen N Fera Primus
67%
Firestone Roadhawk
84%
Mileage
BFGoodrich Advantage
59%
Nexen N Fera Primus
45%
Firestone Roadhawk
73%

Tests used in comparison

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
AutobildAutobild
Summer
2024205/55 R16View

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

View general comparison

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison