18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Nexen N Fera Primus vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

1 mutual test(s) with detailed data

The BFGoodrich Advantage and the Nexen N Fera Primus are two tyres that have been tested extensively across various platforms. Both are designated as summer tyres, making them suitable for dry and wet conditions. However, the similarities don't extend far into actual performance.


The BFGoodrich Advantage, manufactured by BFGoodrich, is known for its excellent dry handling, quiet rolling noise, low rolling resistance, and competitive pricing. Its strengths lie broadly in comfort and stability on dry terrain, which is a significant advantage for speed enthusiasts and everyday users alike. Despite these plus points, it falls short in wet conditions, with notable understeer, which affects its overall rating, leaving it with an overall score of 68%.


On the other hand, the Nexen N Fera Primus, a product of Nexen, stands tall with a superior rating of 71%. Its high acquaplaning quality, secure wet handling, short wet braking distances, and wallet-friendly price point make it an appealing choice. The tyre's standout feature is its ability to perform admirably in both dry and particularly in wet conditions, a factor that had it ranking high in test results. However, it too has limitations. It tends to understeer in dry conditions and has a significantly restricted lifespan allied with a high rolling resistance.


In mutual test comparisons, the Nexen N Fera Primus consistently outperforms the BFGoodrich Advantage. For example, in the Autobild tests, the Nexen Tyre claimed the 10th position out of 50, while the BFGoodrich tyre trailed behind at 20th among 51 tyres tested. Similar results were observed in the ADAC tests, with Nexen securing the 10th position compared to BFGoodrich's 21st position.


In conclusion, while both tyres have their strengths and weaknesses, the Nexen N Fera Primus edges past the BFGoodrich Advantage due to its superior wet handling and aquaplaning qualities. However, if ultimate comfort in dry conditions and noise reduction tops your considerations, the BFGoodrich Advantage might be a better choice.

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
Advantage
Nexen
N Fera Primus
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Number of tests
14
6
26
Best position
#8
#10
#1
Average position
13.4
12.7
2.2
Latest test
2026
2024
2026
Available sizes
153
60
66

Performance comparison

Wet Performance
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Nexen N Fera Primus
71%
Nexen
N Fera Primus
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Wet Braking
BFGoodrich Advantage
64%
Nexen N Fera Primus
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
91%
Wet Handling
BFGoodrich Advantage
59%
Nexen N Fera Primus
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Wet Circle Cornering
BFGoodrich Advantage
59%
Nexen N Fera Primus
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Nexen N Fera Primus
57%
Continental PremiumContact 7
66%
Aquaplaning Cross
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Nexen N Fera Primus
66%
Continental PremiumContact 7
66%
Dry Performance
BFGoodrich Advantage
74%
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Nexen N Fera Primus
66%
Nexen
N Fera Primus
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Dry Braking
BFGoodrich Advantage
71%
Nexen N Fera Primus
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Dry Handling
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Nexen N Fera Primus
61%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Comfort & Noise
BFGoodrich Advantage
82%
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Nexen N Fera Primus
73%
Nexen
N Fera Primus
Continental PremiumContact 7
64%
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Noise Exterior
BFGoodrich Advantage
82%
Nexen N Fera Primus
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
64%
Economy
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Nexen N Fera Primus
56%
Nexen
N Fera Primus
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Rolling Resistance
BFGoodrich Advantage
84%
Nexen N Fera Primus
67%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Mileage
BFGoodrich Advantage
59%
Nexen N Fera Primus
45%
Continental PremiumContact 7
73%

Tests used in comparison

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
AutobildAutobild
Summer
2024205/55 R16View

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

View general comparison

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison