Comparison: BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Michelin Primacy 5 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Falken e.Ziex

Upper-middle

BFGoodrich

Advantage

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Advantage

Primacy 5

Efficient Grip Performance 2

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

e.Ziex

Number of tests

14

3

18

4

5

3

Best position

#8

#1

#3

#1

#2

Average position

13.4

4.7

6.1

12.0

2.2

3.7

Latest test

2026

2024

2025

Available sizes

153

126

47

111

63

34

Wet

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Michelin Primacy 5

58%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Wet braking

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Michelin Primacy 5

65%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

72%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Michelin Primacy 5

51%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

69%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Wet handling

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Aquaplaning - cross

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Wet circle cornering

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

89%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Wet side guide

BFGoodrich Advantage

54%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

67%

Michelin e.Primacy

78%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

Dry

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Michelin Primacy 5

73%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dry braking

BFGoodrich Advantage

76%

Michelin Primacy 5

76%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Dry handling

BFGoodrich Advantage

80%

Michelin Primacy 5

69%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Dry lane changing

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

87%

Michelin e.Primacy

93%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Comfort

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

Michelin Primacy 5

1%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Exterior noise

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Comfort

BFGoodrich Advantage

87%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

60%

Michelin e.Primacy

54%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Costs

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Michelin Primacy 5

63%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

91%

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Rolling resistance

BFGoodrich Advantage

66%

Michelin Primacy 5

63%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

84%

Michelin e.Primacy

67%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Mileage

BFGoodrich Advantage

63%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

100%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Michelin Primacy 5 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Falken e.Ziex

Advantage

Primacy 5

Efficient Grip Performance 2

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

e.Ziex

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison