Comparison: BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Michelin Primacy 5 vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Upper-middle

BFGoodrich

Advantage

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Advantage

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Primacy 5

UltraContact NXT

Number of tests

14

4

3

2

Best position

#8

#3

#2

#1

Average position

13.4

12.0

3.3

4.7

1.0

Latest test

2026

2025

2026

2025

Available sizes

153

111

40

126

23

Wet

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Michelin Primacy 5

58%

Continental UltraContact NXT

56%

Aquaplaning - cross

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Continental UltraContact NXT

68%

Wet braking

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Michelin Primacy 5

65%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Michelin Primacy 5

51%

Continental UltraContact NXT

65%

Wet handling

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

Wet circle cornering

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Continental UltraContact NXT

1%

Wet side guide

BFGoodrich Advantage

54%

Michelin e.Primacy

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

100%

Continental UltraContact NXT

75%

Dry

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Michelin Primacy 5

73%

Continental UltraContact NXT

75%

Dry braking

BFGoodrich Advantage

76%

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Michelin Primacy 5

76%

Continental UltraContact NXT

63%

Dry handling

BFGoodrich Advantage

80%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Michelin Primacy 5

69%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Dry lane changing

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

93%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Continental UltraContact NXT

100%

Comfort

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Michelin Primacy 5

1%

Continental UltraContact NXT

44%

Exterior noise

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Continental UltraContact NXT

42%

Comfort

BFGoodrich Advantage

87%

Michelin e.Primacy

54%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

Costs

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Michelin Primacy 5

63%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Rolling resistance

BFGoodrich Advantage

66%

Michelin e.Primacy

67%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Michelin Primacy 5

63%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Mileage

BFGoodrich Advantage

63%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Michelin Primacy 5 vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Advantage

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Primacy 5

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison