Comparison: BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

Upper-middle

BFGoodrich

Advantage

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Advantage

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip Performance 2

UltraContact NXT

P ZERO PZ4

Number of tests

14

4

3

2

14

Best position

#8

#3

#2

#1

#2

Average position

13.4

12.0

3.3

1.0

5.5

Latest test

2026

2025

2026

2025

Available sizes

153

111

40

23

706

Wet

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Continental UltraContact NXT

56%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

83%

Wet braking

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

78%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Continental UltraContact NXT

65%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

76%

Wet handling

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

90%

Aquaplaning - cross

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Continental UltraContact NXT

68%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

68%

Wet circle cornering

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Continental UltraContact NXT

1%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

89%

Wet side guide

BFGoodrich Advantage

54%

Michelin e.Primacy

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

100%

Continental UltraContact NXT

75%

Dry

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Continental UltraContact NXT

75%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

77%

Dry braking

BFGoodrich Advantage

76%

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Continental UltraContact NXT

63%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

80%

Dry handling

BFGoodrich Advantage

80%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

82%

Dry lane changing

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

93%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Continental UltraContact NXT

100%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

85%

Dry steering response

BFGoodrich Advantage

75%

Michelin e.Primacy

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

84%

Comfort

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Continental UltraContact NXT

44%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

75%

Exterior noise

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Continental UltraContact NXT

42%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

77%

Comfort

BFGoodrich Advantage

87%

Michelin e.Primacy

54%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

74%

Costs

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

52%

Rolling resistance

BFGoodrich Advantage

66%

Michelin e.Primacy

67%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

59%

Mileage

BFGoodrich Advantage

63%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

49%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

Advantage

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip Performance 2

UltraContact NXT

P ZERO PZ4

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison