18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
Advantage
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Number of tests
14
10
3
Best position
#8
#2
#2
Average position
13.4
12.2
3.3
Latest test
2026
2024
2026
Available sizes
153
207
60

Wet

Wet
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
70%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
56%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
95%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
64%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
61%
Hankook Ventus Evo
96%

Dry

Dry
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
73%
Hankook Ventus Evo
83%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
83%
Hankook Ventus Evo
76%
Dry handling
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
62%
Hankook Ventus Evo
90%

Comfort

Comfort
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
62%
Hankook Ventus Evo
75%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
60%
Hankook Ventus Evo
73%
Comfort
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
64%
Hankook Ventus Evo
76%

Costs

Costs
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
70%
Hankook Ventus Evo
80%
Rolling resistance
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
65%
Hankook Ventus Evo
86%
Mileage
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
72%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Price/value
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
83%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison